login

Judicial Remedies, Divorce And Its Theories Under family Law

Comments ¡¤ 819 Views
ASSN: 2458859



In India, divorce is regulated by family law, which is largely governed by legislation such as the Hindu Marriage Act, the Special Marriage Act, the Indian Divorce Act (for Christians), and the Muslim Personal Law (applicable to Muslims).

1. Introduction:

The Hindu Marriage Act, implemented in India in 1955 (1), is a consequential legislative measure aimed at regulating and systematizing the rules pertaining to marriage within the Hindu community. This legislation regulates the formalization and termination of marriages within the Hindu community, encompassing Sikhs, Jains, and Buddhists, who are commonly considered Hindus from a legal standpoint.

2. Judicial Remedies:

The Hindu Marriage Act provides many clauses that give matrimonial reliefs to solve various concerns within marital partnerships. Below is an elucidation of many crucial components that provide these alleviations:

a. Section 9 deals with the legal concept of restitution of conjugal rights. (2)

In this clause, each spouse has the right to request the court to restore conjugal rights if one spouse has unreasonably withdrawn from the other. The objective is to promote the process of reconciliation and the restoration of cohabitation. If the court determines that the petition is legitimate, it has the authority to issue a ruling mandating the respondent to return and cohabit with the petitioner.

b. Judicial Separation: Section 10 (3)

Judicial separation offers a choice for couples who are dealing with irreconcilable disagreements or other legitimate grounds to reside apart without terminating the marriage. It enables a formal legal separation without dissolving the marriage. If the court determines that the grounds established by law, such as cruelty, desertion, or adultery, have been demonstrated, it has the authority to issue a decree of judicial separation.

c. Void Marriages (4)

Section 11 Section 11 pertains to marriages that are deemed void ab initio, indicating that they are invalid from the outset due to certain specified circumstances. These criteria encompass situations where marriage is forbidden owing to consanguinity (blood relatives) or affinity (marriage relations), bigamy, or if one party is unable to provide legitimate permission due to mental incapacity or inability to agree to marriage.

d. Voidable Marriages (5)

Section 12 pertains to marriages that are considered voidable, indicating that they are originally considered legally lawful but can be invalidated under specific conditions. This include weddings in which permission was acquired by deceit, one party was already in a marital union, there was an inability to engage in sexual intercourse, or if the bride was expecting a child from another individual at the time of the marriage.

e. Divorce (6)

Section 13 Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act specifies the reasons for which one can seek a divorce. These grounds encompass acts of cruelty, adultery, desertion, conversion to a different faith, mental instability, leprosy, venereal illness, or the absence of any knowledge of the spouse's existence for a period of seven years or more. If the court is content with the grounds offered, it has the authority to issue a decree of divorce, therefore formally ending the marriage.

These parts establish a legal structure in which married matters can be resolved, presenting possibilities for reconciliation, separation, nullification of invalid marriages, and termination of marriages by divorce. The provisions are designed to safeguard the rights of spouses and enhance the welfare of persons within the institution of marriage.

3. Divorce and it's theories:

In India, divorce is regulated by family law, which is largely governed by legislation such as the Hindu Marriage Act, the Special Marriage Act, the Indian Divorce Act (for Christians), and the Muslim Personal Law (applicable to Muslims). The grounds for divorce in India encompass a combination of ancient norms, religious beliefs, and contemporary legal concepts. These are the main components:

i. Fault-Based and No-Fault Divorce:

In India, divorce was mostly fault-based in the past, necessitating the presentation of evidence for particular reasons such as cruelty, adultery, desertion, or mental illness in order to dissolve the marriage. Nevertheless, the implementation of no-fault divorce under the grounds of "irretrievable breakdown of marriage" has been acknowledged in certain laws. This provision enables spouses to pursue divorce without attributing fault, but rather based on the premise that the marriage is irreversibly harmed.

The fault/guilt theory:

This theory encompasses divorce as a result of marital transgressions. Instances such as adultery, bigamy, and violence, among others. This theory encompasses clauses 13(1) (i), 13(1) (ia), 13(1) (ib), and 13(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act.

The no-fault theory:

The Mutual Consent Theory:

This is a concept that emphasizes the importance of both parties involved in a decision or agreement giving their voluntary and informed consent.
According to this view, both the husband and the wife desire to undergo a voluntary separation, as they hold the belief that they are incompatible for a marital union. This hypothesis is encompassed under section 13(b) of the Hindu Marriage Act.

Both parties to a marriage, regardless of whether the marriage took place before or after the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976, may jointly present a petition for divorce to the district court. This can be done if they have been living apart for at least one year, are unable to reconcile, and have mutually agreed to dissolve the marriage.

Irretrievable breakdown of marriage:

The law under consideration is akin to the concept of No-Fault Divorce. Upon the filing of a divorce petition, the court inquires about the underlying reasons for the couple's desire to separate. Not every instance of the aforementioned ideas necessarily applies. There are situations where a marriage may be lifeless, however the participants are unwilling to jointly agree on a divorce.

The 71st report of the Law Commission proposed that it should be established as a valid reason for divorce. The proposed threshold for determining a breakdown is a time of three years of separation.

4. Conventional and Spiritual Laws:

Personal laws within various communities, such as Hindus, Christians, and Muslims, establish divorce procedures that are based on religious conventions and rituals. Each religious group often has its own distinct reasons for divorce, processes, and remedies that are exclusive to its own laws.

5. Changing Views:

Throughout history, there has been a transition towards more progressive divorce legislation and acceptance of irreparable breakdown as a valid reason for divorce. This acknowledges the evolving values of society and the necessity for a more practical response to marital conflicts.

6. Legal Procedures:

In India, divorce proceedings encompass legal protocols that frequently encompass efforts towards reconciliation, mediation, or counseling prior to the granting of a divorce. Courts strive to ensure that the marriage cannot be saved before granting dissolution.

7. Gender Dynamics:

The legal framework concerning divorce in India also overlaps with matters pertaining to gender parity and women's rights. Legal reforms have been implemented to provide equitable treatment and safeguard the rights of women in divorce proceedings, particularly concerning alimony and child custody.

8. Unique provisions for various religions:

Distinct religious organizations adhere to their own distinct regulations and protocols regarding divorce. Under Muslim Personal Law, the husband has the authority to initiate divorce via means such as talaq. On the other hand, Christians can seek divorce under the Indian Divorce Act based on recognized grounds like adultery or cruelty.

9. Conclusion:

In India, divorce theories in family law consist of a combination of traditional, religious, and modern legal considerations. The recognition of irretrievable breakdown as a legitimate reason for divorce is continuously evolving, reflecting the changing norms of society and the desire for more cooperative and practical methods of ending a marriage, while still protecting the rights of individuals involved.

Citations

1. The Hindu Marriage Act 1955 (Act 25 of 1955).

2. The Hindu Marriage Act 1955 (Act 25 of 1955), s.9.

3. The Hindu Marriage Act 1955 (Act 25 of 1955), s.10.

4. The Hindu Marriage Act 1955 (Act 25 of 1955), s.11.

5. The Hindu Marriage Act 1955 (Act 25 of 1955), s.12.

6. The Hindu Marriage Act 1955 (Act 25 of 1955), s.13.

Comments